Not everyone has noticed this, but for every relatively educated Russian. The time has come to ask themselves almost schizophrenic questions: “Am I a bearer of human capital?”, “If so, how liquid am I as ‘capital’?”, “What can I earn on the market from the monthly sale of the intangible assets that I possess?” The long, though not particularly expensive, train of the Russian economy has already entered tomorrow with its head – the so-called .We are being pulled forward by a high-tech locomotive on a magnetic cushion, in the first car the high foreheads of the architects of communication networks and Internet ecosystems, engineers, programmers, scientists and a few Internet marketers with content specialists are wrinkling. At the same time, in the middle of the train, in compartment cages, disoriented and poorly paid “industrial” people are shaking, and in the tail, carts with poor bearers of peasant consciousness are rumbling.
If people are not paid they will not become
However, scientists who are passionate about the topic already see some trends and patterns. For example, sociologists believe that the country’s human capital (in the narrow sense of the term – see Stanley Fischer’s definition above) is clearly insufficient for building anything “post-industrial”. Science has repeatedly recorded that this problem is the main brake on Russia’s economic development.
An email list is a group of email addresses, usually email list collected for marketing, communication, or promotional reasons. Companies use these lists to send newsletters, special offers, updates, and announcements to their subscribers or customers. Creating an email list usually means gathering addresses through sign-up forms, customer purchases, or other ways people agree to join.
How to understand whether your human “capital” is “post-industrial”
This is not a trivial task. Sociologists argue about who exactly can be classified as a domestic class of “post-industrial” professionals. But this is not exact – perhaps the very fact of receiving income from its implementation is enough, and a formal diploma is not necessary. For now, Russian professionals are studied not as an independent social group, but as part of the “middle class” or “specialists in general.” Or scientists split the cohort into groups called “scientists,” “engineers,” and so on. In the West, the so-called “creative class” (including humanities majors in creative professions) is included in the “post-industrial” category. But in Russia, this term is treated sarcastically, and both humanities majors and young IT specialists are called “creatives”, saying about them. “Look, hipsters have invented the scooter.”
Where do soft skills come from?
In the late 1960s, savvy American military men had an epiphany: they discovered that knowing how to operate equipment was one thing, but managing the ultimate guide to social media platforms for b2b influencer marketing soldiers and motivating them to win was another. Military strategists became concerned: why haven’t we studied this “other” thing, haven’t we catalogued it? Why aren’t we teaching this “other” thing to sergeants or officers? In 1968, they first tried to formulate a definition of the implied group of skills with the help of a team of hired psychologists.
Modern (mis)understanding of the phenomenon
For example, a group of researchers from Harvard, the Carnegie Foundation and the Stanford Research Institute (USA) stated that success in the professional sphere depends 75-85% on the level of development of a person’s soft skills and only 15-25% on professional subject competencies. A 2006 study found that employers believe that the skills least developed in graduates are collaboration and creativity in performing work functions. (Note that our list of “soft skills” also includes a semantic monster called “creativity”).
There is something wrong with the generalization in the concept of “soft skills”
Have you noticed that soft skills, upon closer chicago business inspection, tend to fall apart into the most hard skills? For example, the ability to write a good text – wow, a “soft skill”! It requires specialization and can’t be just a part of some cloud of vanilla powder in which the inscription “soft skills” shimmers. The same applies to the skills of a speechwriter, rhetorician, negotiator, or specialist in work ethics, a field whose sphere somehow suspiciously overlaps with the field of labor law. No matter which of the skills are classified as “soft” rather arbitrarily (have you noticed this?), it turns out that in fact it is either a separate profession or a significant part of a separate profession.
Practical Summary
Go and ask anthropologists, neurobiologists specializing in psychophysiology, behavioral psychologists about soft skills. And you will see how they politely begin to move away from this topic to the area of measurable phenomena and evidence-based science.
They will tell you about the skulls of their ancestors and dental diseases associated with this or that type of diet and farming. They will mention the and instead of “the ability to work together” they will begin to tell you that collectivism is inherent in the descendants of those homo sapiens who grew rice, and individualism is inherent in the heirs of those who planted wheat.